![]() If you love New Yorker Cartoons and you like to have. Daily opportunities to practice your New Yorker Cartoon captioning skills through daily 'theme' posts. Weekly discussions about the current weeks contest, finalists and winners. You, the reader, submit your caption here, we choose three finalists, and you vote for your favorite. This is a group for Captioneers to post their submission ideas, for kudos and critiques. And maybe one day, instead of just helping weed out caption suggestions, researchers can build an AI that will write one on its own. Each week, we provide a cartoon in need of a caption. Thus, efforts to make the lives of Mankoff’s assistants easier has the added benefit of possibly making Microsoft’s Cortana or Skype’s translation features better as well. However, getting computers to “understand” humor is an important step in almost all aspects of interacting with humans and translation. If you ran the same AI against Dilbert or Ziggy caption suggestions you’d get poorer results because the Microsoft AI is trained against the New Yorker’s specific archives. They have learned how to emulate a specific style of humor, although that in itself is pretty cool, because learning how to emulate something, as opposed to being told exactly how to do something is an important step. “Computers can be a great aid.”įrom a technical perspective, computers have not suddenly learned a sense of humor (not even the dry, New Yorker sense of humor). “I do think the future is human-machine companionship,” Mankoff says. You, the reader, submit your caption here, we choose three finalists, and you vote for your favorite. He has spent the last five years working as an English teacher in Thailand. DecemEach week, we provide a cartoon in need of a caption. ![]() Snoderly, who turned 30 shortly after winning the contest, is a BSU graduate with a degree in marketing. It could also save Mankoff the time it takes to hire new assistants. The latest Boise winner, whose successful caption was published in the March 25 issue, is Zak Snoderly. “On average, we saved about 50 percent of his workload,” says Shahaf. That means the New Yorker could use the system to eliminate at least 2,200 submissions a week without missing the gems. About 55.8% of the time the humans agree with the captions the AI selects, which is a pretty good percentage. Fifty percent of the time, he says, the first caption wins. ![]() Dafna Shahaf, a researcher at Microsoft, used the database of cartoons to train the program to understand commonalities and differences in the millions of cartoons, which lets the AI run through the entries the New Yorker receives each week for its back-of-magazine cartoon caption contest. Brody, who has read The New Yorker for more than 40 years - starting as a kid when hed find it in doctors waiting rooms and would peruse its regular cartoons, says the contests popular vote favors the finalist caption thats listed first.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |